🔗 Share this article

Last year, star Jude Law remarked he had no concerns about backlash for portraying Vladimir Putin in a cinematic adaptation. The movie, however, could coincide too neatly with the mythologized version promoted by Russian state media that, within Russia, it reads as a endorsement rather than a challenge.

The Crafted Strongman

For years, the Russian political apparatus and its entertainment industry have collaborated to craft a made-to-measure version of Putin. This figure is a political superhero without age or mistakes, a former spy reframed as a Russian James Bond who always knows more than he reveals.

“In Russia, the constructed Putin has long eclipsed the actual person.”

Cinematic Reinforcement

One recent example is a TV series released last fall, directed by a Kremlin supporter. The protagonist is a invented security officer selected by fate to “save” Russia from chaos. Although he is called a different name, the message is unmistakable: the hero must be a known figure from the secret services.

International depictions frequently result in reinforcing this same narrative instead of debunking it. An adaptation based on a bestselling satirical novel aims to subvert the leader's mythology by presenting him as a symptom but as a symptom, shifting the narrative weight to the spin doctors surrounding him.

The Fable of the Hesitant President

In the film, Putin is shown as having been picked by powerful oligarchs to steady the country because he is “a fit former intelligence agent”. The oligarchs approach him and all but beg him to take the top job. He replies is that he would rather govern from the shadows, seeking permanent power.

This tale is a key piece of state propaganda: the cool, reluctant strategist shaped by destiny. Historically, none of this ever happened.

The Reality of the Casting Call

No one ever begged Putin to take the job. The presidency was in essence a casting call with no shortage of contenders. Central to the selection stood a powerful businessman from the Yeltsin era who planned to control the state in practice.

• His list featured various figures, among them an opposition leader subsequently assassinated and a former spy chief.
• Per an expert who studied Putin’s biography, the future president merely met the required parameters: loyal, from the intelligence world, and not a communist or a liberal.
• A businessman close to the events stated the key criterion was controllability and faithfulness, not leadership.

“They didn’t need a strong candidate, they needed someone malleable, someone who would obey orders.”

Building the 007 Persona

Analysts concur that the image of him as a master operative was built after the fact. Claims about his clandestine activities in East Germany do not stand up to scrutiny. In essence, he was an administrator and routine duties, a mid-level functionary not engaged in field operations.

Interestingly, the move to framing him as a “007” may in part have been triggered by the actor's debut as 007. The grittier interpretation led local outlets and online audiences to draw visual parallels with their leader. Edited images swapping Craig’s face with Putin’s surfaced on Moscow streets, fueling the growing tendency to see him as a Russian 007.

A Diplomatic Opportunity?

Given the casting, an star popular with viewers there, the Kremlin are likely to seize the opportunity to portray this choice as a small victory. The film's omission of public dissent, the political rivals, or key figures in the story, even though it includes the past decade, is a pleasant bonus for state propaganda.

In Russian cinema, Putin is frequently an all-powerful presence who remains unseen on screen. He is hinted at through photographs or calls “from above”. Now, he at last gets a famous actor's visage—one that could unintentionally echo the very myths it perhaps aims to examine.